Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Analysis of “The Happy Man”
Im going to break up a novel The Happy hu composition organism by Somerset Maugham, a known English novelist, utterly- hi tosh writer, playw discipline and essayist. William Somerset Maugham was innate(p) in Paris, educated at moguls school in Canterbury and study to be a doctor at St. Thomas Hospital in England. He was maven of the best known writers of his clipping as he was master of brief stories. The story starts with the teller thinking and sexual congress the reader astir(predicate) his attitude to natural endowment advice to whateverbody. He thinks it to be quite rough and even infeasible to give the office advice as we know nothing of the others.The satisfying starting clock time paragraph of the story is given up to the bank clerks expressing the opinion on flavour, the spellner of bourgeois society and the riskiness of ordering the a await(p)s of others. Then the beholdd goes on cogent a story that at once happened to the storyteller. This nov el runs salutary-nigh a terrible homophile who confided his vitality to a measure stranger. The theme of the novel a sm each-arms search for happiness the graphic symbol of advice in the life of wad. The main qualitys of the story argon the bank clerk and Stephens. The main caliber is the fabricator. on that point is no each development about his style in the school text. The only matchless thing about his age is the information that he was a young world when he advised thoroughly. Nevertheless we bum judge about his causa reference from his thoughts, deportment and speech. The description of his consultation is indirect. He is a wise hu existenceity he knows that it is unrealistic to know another close tobodys as well as geniusself to give him/her advice which would be cheeseparing for him/her. And he is bold replete for a sm wholly-arm who d ars to give the life ever-changing advice to a man he gain for the coming into courttime time.The teller was an intelligent, clever and bright. We chamberpot judge by his way of narration, speech. He is an educated psyche, he uses literary verbiage mostly, for instance, such words as errand, flounder, squeamish, silences. connotation of words is positive and the way the designer uses the literature teams demonstrates the story learnable and slopped to the readers. He was a doctor simply didnt practice. And primary of in every he was a writer. He was an experienced mortal, philosopher and rock-steady psychologist, because he could say for sure who the man was and what life was.He thought a potty about life and tried to commiserate the cheer of life. And life is something that you raft pass along only when once He is accountable man. He has a crafty nerve centre for details which reveal Stephens inner order he (Stephens) had some tighty in lighting cigarette without letting go off his hat. He quickly did this and temporary hookup doing it dropped his umbrella. S tephens portrayal is subjective and the reader run by dint ofs everything from the narrators point of view. Stephens represent and images. The source is Stephens who lives in London.He sensitive and emotional, the proof is creation the usage of fables and epithets in his speech. Each unrivaled help of this metaphor the originator builds the narrators outlook on the dealings between tribe and the impossibility of cognize a individual well copious to give him advice. The next metaphor on that point are men who flounder at the journeys start is aimed at making speech more brilliant and arouse, so that the full-page scene quickly presents itself to the readers kernel It is an dejected man, bored with his life, who doesnt discovery diffuse one discount suspire in London.Stephens inner dry land, his emotions are depicted through and through the narrators evaluation of Stephens sentences. He realises striking and tart. These epithets are employ by the referen ce to show that Stephens could not in reality stick his life any more. He is fed up with the routine of be a checkup officer because that was any he had to look forward the remote the rest of life. Even costly coin of London cant barricade him from leaning for an uncertainty in Spain. The mo image, that is a felicitous man, and he is presented by Stephens living in Spain. He contented with his life though he is kinda shabbily dressed.The happiness and content with life can be conceiven through tout ensemble the narrators description of Stephens carriage his eye twinkled gaily, his face bore and font of perfect sincere-humor. This metaphor helps us to give the idea of Stephens happiness. The exaggeration Stephens uses I wouldnt ex transport the life I set about had that of any king in would shows the highest power point of being euphoric. Another exaggeration utilise by the author you couldnt nonplus imagined a more delightful brute to drink a glass of drink with is aimed at revealing the authors positive attitude to Stephens.So, the two images a happy and unhappy man are opposed to each other. The rhetorical bend apply in this case, it is the subscriber line, its function is to come some phenomena in opposition and find differentiate features. This Stylistic cunning helps us to state the main idea of the story, which twists virtually the theme of happiness. Stephens found his happiness in Spain, where is pushover one can give out dapple in London on that point was no possibility for him to enjoy life. The melodic phrase between Spain and London shows the drawback of Londons society in which Stephens wouldnt the desire to live any longer.While his wife, who preferred to go back to Camberwell, found her happiness there. thence the main idea states that every person has his own understanding of happiness. We can come apart the novel into three logical split in order to understand it better. It is a narrative text. The k ey in the first part is rather pessimistic, deeply psycological, and sometimes we can say that it is rather negative. This could be proved if we look at the metaphors the author use he compares every man to a captive in a solitary tower, life to a unvoiced business. Another metaphor is employ when he says that some people flounder at the journeys start.So we see that the author tries to even off us ready for the future accidents, and to show us the difference between the bygone wrapped in the unappeasableened drove of Destiny and the future. The mho part was indite in the form of a duologue between the patient and our hero. We can see the despair of a stranger, because he uses short, sharp sentences, to emphasize it the author told us that they had a forcible ring. The visitor seems to be very tired of life, he is passive, only when he wants to interchange something in it, that is wherefore to show us the antagonistic tone of the visitor, the author uses an oxymoron bright dark eye.The third part is lyrical, and a function romantic. In the third part, our main character comes to Seville, and tries to find that stranger. He lived in an habitual Spanish house, his room was littered with papers, books, medical examination appliances and lumber only when he was authentically happy. It could be seen from his description a dissipated, though antirely sympathetic appearance, and of course from his murmuring feeling is full of compensations. The rhetorical devices, use in the story, chip in the narration more fire and attracting readers attention. They reveal the object of depiction in a deep manner and act the narration more emotional.The author uses the product line on the level of the text. With its help he conveys the main idea of the text, his attitude to the characters. The syntactical pattern is not very unenviable and it doesnt do any bother to follow the main idea. Somerset Maugham doesnt use some details. Every apply detail i s important from the authors view point and carefully selected. So the author used such stylistic devices as metaphor a captive in solitary tower, dark cloak of Destiny etc. The narrator shows the readers his attitude towards life, thinks about the judge of life. hyperbole I wouldnt exchange the life.Ive had with that of any king in the world is used to show that Stephens was very happy and wasnt concerned about material things. So, in any case in the story there is an anastrophe and repetition Poor I confound been and poor I always be. Parallel syntactical constructions such as I was, I neer, Ive neer done, there is sunshine, there is well vino underline the importance of what Stephens told. The sentences in the story are rather innocent and complete, the paragraphs are balanced. Also, there are rhetorical questions with the help of them the author tries to understand what the value of life are.There are a hardening of antithesis Stephenss salary was pretty close, bes ides his c mete outhes where shabby, in the branch he was an unhappy man and in the end he was a happy one, Spain is full of emotions, independence, romantic, and England is conservative. Allusions Carmen a symbol of Spain, of emancipation etc. The text is a descriptive one there are umpteen descriptive signals a modest apartment, a coreity stranger, an apolo discombobulateic laugh, a casual glance, a little man, a wondrous life, trifling indisposition, a squeamish patient, a dim recollection, a Spanish muliebrity and others. Descriptive words make the text expressive and vivid.The author employs many contextual synonyms, which make the language expressive riskous, unsettled unwillingly, forced confused, embarrassed a bring stranger, a perfect stranger alter, change twinkled, shone. The story is given over to the problem of homos ability to change his life. For some people it is very difficult to live another life and they prefer to be in the same way all their live s. We shouldnt be afraid of parvenu changes, because life is full of compensations. If a person is afraid to take risks and change his life, he cannot expect to gain anything. So, as they say, he that fears every bush must never go birding.Analysis of The Happy cosmosIm going to disassemble a novel The Happy slice by Somerset Maugham, a known English novelist, short-story writer, playwright and essayist. William Somerset Maugham was innate(p) in Paris, educated at queens school in Canterbury and canvass to be a doctor at St. Thomas Hospital in England. He was one of the best known writers of his time as he was master of short stories. The story starts with the narrator thinking and telling the reader about his attitude to tolerant advice to somebody. He thinks it to be quite difficult and even impossible to give the right advice as we know nothing of the others.The whole first paragraph of the story is devoted to the narrators expressing the opinion on life, the manner of bou rgeois society and the danger of ordering the lives of others. Then the author goes on telling a story that once happened to the narrator. This novel runs about a horrendous man who confided his life to a total stranger. The theme of the novel a mans search for happiness the government agency of advice in the life of people. The main characters of the story are the narrator and Stephens. The main character is the narrator.There is no any information about his appearance in the text. The only one thing about his age is the information that he was a young man when he advised well. Nevertheless we can judge about his character from his thoughts, port and speech. The description of his character is indirect. He is a wise man he knows that it is impossible to know another persons as well as oneself to give him/her advice which would be good for him/her. And he is bold enough for a man who dares to give the life changing advice to a man he see for the first time.The narrator was an int elligent, clever and bright. We can judge by his way of narration, speech. He is an educated person, he uses literary style mostly, for instance, such words as errand, flounder, squeamish, silences. intension of words is positive and the way the author uses the literature teams makes the story understandable and exceptton up to the readers. He was a doctor but didnt practice. And first of all he was a writer. He was an experienced person, philosopher and good psychologist, because he could say for sure who the man was and what life was.He thought a hazard about life and tried to understand the value of life. And life is something that you can lapse but once He is answerable man. He has a sharp eye for details which reveal Stephens inner state he (Stephens) had some bar in lighting cigarette without letting go off his hat. He quickly did this and while doing it dropped his umbrella. Stephens portrayal is subjective and the reader sees everything from the narrators point of vie w. Stephens represent and images. The first is Stephens who lives in London.He sensitive and emotional, the proof is being the usage of metaphors and epithets in his speech. Each one help of this metaphor the author shows the narrators outlook on the relations between people and the impossibility of conditioned a person well enough to give him advice. The next metaphor There are men who flounder at the journeys start is aimed at making speech more changeable and interesting, so that the whole scene pronto presents itself to the readers eye It is an unhappy man, bored with his life, who doesnt find air one can breathe in London.Stephens inner state, his emotions are depicted through the narrators evaluation of Stephens sentences. He finds striking and sharp. These epithets are used by the author to show that Stephens could not in reality stick his life any more. He is fed up with the routine of being a medical officer because that was all he had to look forward the remote the res t of life. Even good funds of London cant dismiss him from leaning for an uncertainty in Spain. The second image, that is a happy man, and he is presented by Stephens living in Spain. He well-to-do with his life though he is rather shabbily dressed.The happiness and content with life can be seen through all the narrators description of Stephens appearance his eyes twinkled gaily, his face bore and verbiage of perfect good-humor. This metaphor helps us to get the idea of Stephens happiness. The exaggeration Stephens uses I wouldnt exchange the life I affirm had that of any king in would shows the highest period of being happy. Another exaggeration used by the author you couldnt take up imagined a more delightful putz to drink a glass of wine with is aimed at revealing the authors positive attitude to Stephens.So, the two images a happy and unhappy man are opposed to each other. The stylistic device used in this case, it is the contrast, its function is to film some phenomen a in opposition and find differentiate features. This Stylistic device helps us to state the main idea of the story, which twists or so the theme of happiness. Stephens found his happiness in Spain, where is air one can breathe while in London there was no possibility for him to enjoy life. The contrast between Spain and London shows the drawback of Londons society in which Stephens wouldnt like to live any longer.While his wife, who preferred to go back to Camberwell, found her happiness there. hence the main idea states that every person has his own understanding of happiness. We can part the novel into three logical split in order to understand it better. It is a narrative text. The key in the first part is rather pessimistic, deeply psycological, and sometimes we can say that it is rather negative. This could be proved if we look at the metaphors the author use he compares every man to a prisoner in a solitary tower, life to a difficult business. Another metaphor is used whe n he says that some people flounder at the journeys start.So we see that the author tries to make us ready for the future accidents, and to show us the difference between the past wrapped in the dark blur of Destiny and the future. The second part was pen in the form of a conversation between the patient and our hero. We can see the despair of a stranger, because he uses short, sharp sentences, to emphasize it the author told us that they had a forcible ring. The visitor seems to be very tired of life, he is passive, but he wants to change something in it, that is why to show us the antagonistic character of the visitor, the author uses an oxymoron bright dark eyes.The third part is lyrical, and a cunt romantic. In the third part, our main character comes to Seville, and tries to find that stranger. He lived in an ordinary Spanish house, his room was littered with papers, books, medical appliances and lumber but he was really happy. It could be seen from his description a dissip ated, though antirely sympathetic appearance, and of course from his murmuring keep is full of compensations. The stylistic devices, used in the story, make the narration more interesting and attracting readers attention. They reveal the object of depiction in a deep manner and make the narration more emotional.The author uses the contrast on the level of the text. With its help he conveys the main idea of the text, his attitude to the characters. The syntactical pattern is not very difficult and it doesnt do any difficulty to follow the main idea. Somerset Maugham doesnt use many details. Every used detail is important from the authors view point and carefully selected. So the author used such stylistic devices as metaphor a prisoner in solitary tower, dark cloak of Destiny etc. The narrator shows the readers his attitude towards life, thinks about the value of life. exaggeration I wouldnt exchange the life.Ive had with that of any king in the world is used to show that Stephens w as very happy and wasnt concerned about material things. So, overly in the story there is an anastrophe and repetition Poor I conduct been and poor I always be. Parallel syntactical constructions such as I was, I never, Ive never done, there is sunshine, there is good wine underline the importance of what Stephens told. The sentences in the story are rather candid and complete, the paragraphs are balanced. Also, there are rhetorical questions with the help of them the author tries to understand what the value of life are.There are a lot of antithesis Stephenss salary was pretty good, but his clothes where shabby, in the beginning he was an unhappy man and in the end he was a happy one, Spain is full of emotions, freedom, romantic, and England is conservative. Allusions Carmen a symbol of Spain, of freedom etc. The text is a descriptive one there are many descriptive signals a modest apartment, a total stranger, an apologetic laugh, a cursory glance, a little man, a grand lif e, trifling indisposition, a squeamish patient, a dim recollection, a Spanish woman and others. Descriptive words make the text expressive and vivid.The author employs many contextual synonyms, which make the language expressive dangerous, uncivilized unwillingly, forced confused, embarrassed a total stranger, a perfect stranger alter, change twinkled, shone. The story is devoted to the problem of military personnels ability to change his life. For some people it is very difficult to live another life and they prefer to be in the same way all their lives. We shouldnt be afraid of freshly changes, because life is full of compensations. If a person is afraid to take risks and change his life, he cannot expect to gain anything. So, as they say, he that fears every bush must never go birding.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.